Mediyoga
We have developed a state-of-the-art wellness platform for Mediyoga. This platform is aligned with our vision to use technology for human benefits.
We build digital health platforms that pass compliance review the first time and connect cleanly to the EHRs your clinical teams already use. Engineering, not just integration checkboxes, is what gets your product from sandbox to production.
Trusted by industry leaders
HD video consultation, e-prescribing, and asynchronous care workflows built on infrastructure that holds up under real patient load, not a demo-day version.
SMART on FHIR connections that pull and push structured clinical data into Epic, Oracle Health, Athena, and Meditech without breaking when those vendors patch their APIs.
IoMT device ingestion, vital-sign thresholds, and alerting pipelines that route the right signal to the right clinician without burying them in noise.
Ambient documentation, triage support, and decision-support layers that sit on top of existing EHR data instead of asking clinicians to learn a second system.
Get a free architecture review before you commit to a vendor or a timeline.
Get a Free Architecture ReviewEvery integration is mapped to the current FHIR and certification requirements before a line of code ships.
SMART on FHIR app registration, Epic App Orchard review prep, and Chart Review/Flowsheet data mapping for inpatient and ambulatory workflows.
Millennium platform API mapping, HealtheIntent data exchange where applicable, and PowerChart-aligned clinical data models.
athenaNet API access provisioning and ambulatory-focused clinical data sync for outpatient and practice management use cases.
MEDITECH Greenfield FHIR API mapping for hospitals running Expanse, including patient and encounter resource alignment.
Most healthtech delays trace back to compliance and integration decisions made too late, not weak engineering. HIPAA and GDPR obligations shape data architecture from the first sprint, not the last. HTI-1’s USCDI v3 and US Core 6.1.0 requirements mean an integration built against last year’s spec needs rework before launch. Layer in AI features and the question shifts from “does it work” to “can you explain what it did and why,” which is a documentation and audit-trail problem as much as a model problem. Teams that treat compliance as a final QA pass, instead of an architectural input, end up rebuilding data layers mid-project.
We map HIPAA/GDPR obligations and the specific EHR systems involved before writing a scope document, including which FHIR resources and SMART App Launch flows the build depends on. This is where most vendors guess and we don't.
PHI handling, encryption, audit logging, and BAA-aligned infrastructure get designed into the data model from day one. Secure ADLC embeds these controls into the development pipeline itself rather than bolting them on before launch.
Engineers ship in two-week increments with daily updates and live demos against real clinical scenarios, so compliance and clinical stakeholders see working software early enough to redirect it.
Integration code runs against the actual EHR vendor's sandbox (Epic App Orchard, Oracle Health, Athena, or Meditech Greenfield) before production credentials are requested, catching auth and data-mapping issues before they cost a launch date.
Security review, HIPAA/GDPR documentation, and a full source code and infrastructure handover close the engagement, with L1/L2/L3 SLA support available if your team wants continuity post-launch.
A focused review of your existing compliance posture, integration plan, or technical debt. Best for teams validating a build-vs-buy decision.
Architecture review followed by full development through launch. Best for teams ready to commit once the technical plan is validated.
Long-term embedded team covering build, post-launch support, and ongoing feature development. Best for teams scaling past MVP into multi-year roadmaps.
Most builds range from $15,000 for a focused MVP to $150,000+ for a multi-vendor EHR-integrated platform. Tell us your scope and we'll map a realistic range within two business days.
| Standard | Scope | Who Needs It | Our Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
|
HIPAA |
PHI handling, access controls, BAA execution |
US-based patient data products |
Full, BAA available |
|
HL7 FHIR US Core 6.1.0 |
Clinical data exchange format |
Any EHR-integrated product |
Full implementation |
|
GDPR |
EU patient data rights and consent |
Products with EU users |
Full, DPA available |
|
SMART App Launch v2.0.0 |
OAuth-based EHR app authorization |
Apps connecting to Epic, Oracle Health, Athena, Meditech |
Full implementation |
|
SOC 2 |
Infrastructure security controls |
Enterprise and hospital-system buyers |
Full, audit-ready |
We have developed a state-of-the-art wellness platform for Mediyoga. This platform is aligned with our vision to use technology for human benefits.
Carepoint is a solution dedicated to the pharmacy industry with a variety of tools needed to manage any pharmacy.
Day One is a journaling app developed by Citrusbug Technolabs for iPhone, iPad, and Mac devices.
They cover building digital health products such as telemedicine platforms, EHR-integrated tools, remote monitoring systems, and patient engagement apps, with compliance and clinical workflow built in from the start.
A focused MVP typically starts around $15,000. EHR-integrated platforms with multi-vendor support and AI features often range from $50,000 to $150,000 depending on scope.
Most run 3 to 5 months. EHR sandbox approval timelines from vendors like Epic or Oracle Health are usually the variable outside our control, not the development work itself.
Yes. We audit the current architecture, identify what's salvageable, and rework the compliance and integration layers without a full rebuild where it isn't necessary.
Yes, a BAA is standard practice on any engagement involving PHI, and it's executed before development access begins.
We monitor vendor changelogs for the systems in scope and absorb minor API changes within the existing sprint cycle. Major version changes get scoped separately and communicated before any rework starts.
Yes, most healthtech builds ship as responsive web platforms with native or cross-platform mobile apps where patient-facing access on the go genuinely matters.
Full source code, infrastructure documentation, compliance artifacts, and a knowledge transfer session with the team that built it, not a generic README.