HIPAA
SOC 2
HITRUST CSF
ISO 27001
Trusted By Industry Leaders
Certifications and Accreditations
Whether a patient’s home qualifies as a covered origination point changes by payer, state, and sometimes by month. We model this as configurable data, not conditional statements buried in the booking flow.
Some services qualify for audio-only reimbursement, others require video, and the list shifts with each CMS rule cycle. The eligibility check needs to be editable without a deploy.
The current DEA extension permits Schedule II-V prescribing via audio-video telemedicine through December 31, 2026, with narrower audio-only allowances for opioid use disorder treatment. Prescribing workflows need to enforce whichever ruleset applies to that prescriber and that visit type.
A provider licensed in one state can’t automatically see a patient in another. Platforms that hardcode a single-state assumption break the moment a practice expands.
Walk through your current telehealth setup with an engineer, not a salesperson.
Book a Platform Review
Low-latency audio and video built on WebRTC-based infrastructure (Twilio, Vonage, Daily.co, or Agora, depending on your scale and cost profile), not a custom-built streaming stack that becomes a maintenance burden years later.
Bidirectional data exchange with Epic, athenahealth, and other systems via FHIR R4/R4B and HL7, so visit notes, orders, and history flow without a second login.
Continuous vitals data from connected devices routed into clinician dashboards with threshold-based alerting, not just a raw data dump nobody reviews.
NCPDP SCRIPT-based prescribing with DEA-compliant electronic prescribing for controlled substances built in from day one, not bolted on after a compliance audit flags it.
Not every visit needs to be live. Image-based dermatology consults, pre-visit questionnaires, and follow-up messaging reduce scheduling pressure on both sides.
Appointment booking, rescheduling, and no-show reduction through automated reminders tuned to the patient population, not a generic calendar widget.
Telehealth platforms carry PHI across more surfaces than most healthcare software, video, chat, monitoring data, and prescribing records, which means the compliance architecture has to cover each surface individually rather than treating "HIPAA compliant" as one checkbox.
End-to-end encryption for video, messaging, and stored PHI
Role-based access control with session-level audit trails
HITRUST CSF-aligned infrastructure for enterprise buyers who require it
DEA EPCS certification support for controlled-substance prescribing workflows
We map your specific compliance surface before writing code: which states you operate in, which payers you bill, whether controlled-substance prescribing is in scope, and which EHR you need to talk to. This becomes the configuration layer, not an afterthought bolted on post-launch.
We design the video, data, and integration layers alongside the rules engine that will hold your eligibility and reimbursement logic, so compliance changes later are configuration updates, not code changes.
Integration work happens early, not at the end, because EHR and RPM device connections surface the hardest edge cases. Waiting until launch week to discover an interoperability gap is the most common cause of slipped timelines we see.
Development runs in two-week sprints with working builds reviewed regularly, so scope drift gets caught before it becomes a rewrite.
Security testing, HIPAA safeguard verification, and DEA EPCS certification steps run in parallel with QA, not as a separate phase that adds months at the end.
We deploy with monitoring in place from day one, so a spike in dropped video sessions or a failed EHR sync gets caught before patients notice.
We worked with a multi-state behavioral health provider to rebuild the compliance logic sitting underneath their video and scheduling layers, replacing rules that had been hardcoded per state with a configurable eligibility and prescribing engine that a compliance lead could update directly.
Multi-state eligibility rules rebuilt as configuration, not code
DEA prescribing logic isolated from state licensing checks
Existing EHR integration carried through the rebuild without disruption
Rules engine designed to absorb future CMS and DEA policy changes without a redeploy
Their agile way of working, competence, and friendliness are impressive.December 7, 2024
Citrusbug Technolabs handles a data extraction project for an education company. They're also responsible for managing an AI generation project for the client.
Citrusbug Technolabs has laid out and followed a clear project outline and consistently met deadlines. The team communicates well and demonstrates a strong understanding of the client's vision and goals. Their agile approach, high level of competence, and personable approach stand out.
Read More
Their communication and ability to capture exactly what I was asking for were impressive.November 14, 2024
Citrusbug Technolabs built an automated system for a veteran medical company. The system needed to collect and store user data, generate customized letters based on surveys, and use AI to summarize reviews.
Citrusbug Technolabs delivered a functional automated system that successfully organized the client's records and auto-generated statements. The team was quick to respond, addressed all roadblocks, and communicated effectively. Overall, their ability to understand the client's needs stood out.
Read More
They were very calm and talented, and they did bring some of their own ideas.January 28, 2025
Citrusbug Technolabs has developed an MVP for a freight and capacity marketplace. The team has created three different interfaces for three market segments.
Citrusbug Technolabs has successfully developed an effective MVP. The team has delivered the project on time and almost within budget. Moreover, their responses have been timely. Overall, the team has been calm, talented, and innovative. This has led to the client's satisfaction.
Read More
What stood out most about them was their personalized approach and sense of ownership in every aspect of the project."February 27, 2024
Citrusbug Technolabs built a Flutter cross-platform mobile app for an education company. They also developed two web apps and an admin panel and provided DevOps support for the client's infrastructure.
Citrusbug Technolabs' support successfully boosted the client's user engagement by 8x, resulting in an 85% retention rate. The reliable team demonstrated a dedication to delivering on time and promptly responding to concerns and adjustments. Their personalized, client-centric approach stood out.
Read More
They didn't like the phrase "impossible to do", which made them very solution-oriented.February 19, 2024
A healthcare company hired Citrusbug Technolabs to design and develop a user-friendly application. The team provided tailored assistance to meet the client's requirements.
Citrusbug Technolabs successfully delivered an application that was ready for market. The team was highly professional and well-organized; they stayed focused throughout the engagement and were receptive to changes. Overall, they stood out for their trustworthiness and commitment to excellence.
Read More
They're 100% on time and transparent throughout each stage of the project.February 24, 2024
A financial technology company has hired Citrusbug Technolabs to build a custom web application. The team handles the development and design of the app.
The project is ongoing, but the client has been satisfied with Citrusbug Technolabs' services. The team is very professional — they always respect timelines and provide regular updates to ensure everyone's on the same page. Also, their transparent approach makes them a trustworthy partner.
Read More
"I do believe they are exceptional at where they stand."
Citrusbug Technolabs took on a mobile app development project for a Singapore-based development house. They were provided with UX designs to execute. Currently, they're finalizing and fine-tuning the product.
Citrusbug Technolabs contributed to the successful launch of the product, which has garnered over 10,000 users in just three months. The product has also received support from investors. They consistently followed-up with their progress and delivered at a speedy rate. The team is truly stellar.
Read More
Where This Telehealth Platform Development Approach Fits
Most vendors will show you a features list. What actually determines whether the platform survives its second year is the layer underneath the features, specifically whether compliance and reimbursement logic live as configurable rules or as scattered conditionals across the codebase.
Built on a WebRTC-based provider rather than custom infrastructure, giving you enterprise-grade reliability without owning the maintenance burden of a video stack.
Originating site, audio-only eligibility, and DEA prescribing rules live as editable configuration, not hardcoded logic, so policy changes are admin updates.
FHIR-based connectors to EHR systems and device APIs for continuous monitoring data, designed to avoid the vendor lock-in that comes from proprietary integration formats.
.svg){kind=icon}
Role-based access spanning patients, providers, and administrative staff, with API contracts clean enough that adding a new payer integration doesn't touch unrelated modules.
A telehealth platform that hardcodes today's reimbursement rules isn't just a technical liability, it's a business risk every time a policy deadline approaches. When Medicare's telehealth flexibilities lapsed twice within five months, providers running rigid platforms faced real revenue exposure while their patients lost access to covered visits. The platforms that kept billing cleanly were the ones where eligibility logic could be updated in an afternoon.
Costs typically range from $30,000 for a focused MVP to $100,000+ for a fully integrated, multi-state enterprise platform, depending on integrations, compliance scope, and prescribing requirements.
Core video visits, scheduling, and basic EHR sync to validate the model before scaling.
Full platform with RPM ingestion, e-prescribing, and the configurable compliance rules engine.
Multi-specialty platform with payer integrations, advanced analytics, and dedicated compliance tooling.
Every quarter you delay telehealth platform development is a quarter your competitors capture patients who already prefer virtual visits for routine and follow-up care. Waiting for reimbursement rules to feel permanent has never worked, since federal telehealth policy has shifted on a near-annual cycle since 2020.
The providers who built with adaptable compliance logic didn’t wait for stability. They built for volatility instead, and their platforms have carried them through two Medicare telehealth lapses without a single emergency deployment.
We build eligibility and prescribing rules as editable data, so a DEA or CMS policy change is a configuration update, not a development ticket.
Requirements, compliance mapping, and integration scope get documented before a single sprint starts, cutting the rework that comes from surprises mid-build.
You get complete source code and documentation at delivery. No dependency on us to make future changes.
We regularly take over telehealth builds that stalled with another vendor and get them to launch without a full restart.
Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly changing how healthcare is delivered and managed. From enhancing diagnostic accuracy to automating time-consuming administrative tasks, AI technologies are increasingly being woven into the fabric…
Read Article →
Artificial Intelligence
The healthcare sector is changing quickly in order to streamline and expedite operations. People have noticed significant changes in the healthcare industry since NLP was introduced. AI software development makes…
Read Article →
Custom Software Development
Introduction Healthcare is deep into a cloud-first decade, where digital transformation, data-driven decision-making, and scalable cloud platforms are reshaping how care is delivered and managed. Electronic health records, imaging, telehealth,…
Read Article →MVPs typically start around $30,000. Fully integrated, multi-state enterprise platforms with e-prescribing and RPM run $60,000 to $100,000+, depending on compliance and integration scope.
An MVP takes 8-12 weeks. A core platform with EHR and device integrations runs 4-6 months. Enterprise, multi-specialty builds take 9+ months.
Yes, if it's built that way. We architect eligibility, originating site, and prescribing rules as configurable data specifically so policy shifts don't require a rebuild.
Yes, through FHIR R4/R4B and HL7-based connectors to systems like Epic and athenahealth, so records, orders, and visit notes sync without duplicate entry.
Yes. We build NCPDP SCRIPT-based e-prescribing with DEA EPCS support, aligned with current prescribing flexibilities for audio-video and, where applicable, audio-only visits.
Yes. Interstate licensure and per-state eligibility logic get built into the compliance rules engine rather than assumed as a single-state model.
Yes, this comes up often. We audit the existing codebase and compliance gaps first, then decide what to keep versus rebuild, rather than starting over by default.
We offer L1/L2/L3 support options post-launch, including monitoring for compliance rule updates as federal and state policy shifts occur.
