Citrusbug Healthcare →
HIPAA
SOC 2
ISO 27001
GDPR
Trusted by industry leaders
Certifications and Accreditations
Our cloud migration consulting services cover everything from the first workload audit to the FinOps review six months after cutover.
We audit your existing infrastructure, map application dependencies, and score each workload against the 6 Rs framework before recommending a single move. The output is a migration roadmap with a TCO estimate, not a sales deck.
We design the account structure, network segmentation, and identity model your workloads will actually run on, built for enterprise scale rather than pulled from a template.
Whether a workload needs a straight rehost or a full rearchitect, our engineers execute the migration with a tested rollback plan and a defined downtime window. Once it’s live, our DevOps services team owns the deployment pipeline going forward, instead of leaving it half-configured.
Once workloads are live, we tune autoscaling, right-size compute, and set up cloud cost optimization reporting so cloud spend stays visible instead of surprising your CFO in month four.
Get expert guidance to assess your current environment, define the right migration approach, and reduce disruption throughout the transition.
Discuss Your Migration PlanA few years ago, the advice was simple: get off-premises, get elastic, get modern. Most of that advice still holds for workloads with genuinely variable demand. It stops holding for the steady-state, high-utilization systems that a lot of enterprises migrated anyway, because migrating everything was easier to sell than migrating the right things.
That’s part of why over 80% of enterprises now say they expect to move at least some workloads back off public cloud in the next year. The problem was never the cloud itself. It was treating every workload the same. Real cloud migration consulting starts from that assessment, not a sales pitch for moving everything. A proper engagement should tell you which systems belong in the cloud, which belong on dedicated infrastructure, and which aren’t worth touching yet, before a single server moves.
Their agile way of working, competence, and friendliness are impressive.December 7, 2024
Citrusbug Technolabs handles a data extraction project for an education company. They're also responsible for managing an AI generation project for the client.
Citrusbug Technolabs has laid out and followed a clear project outline and consistently met deadlines. The team communicates well and demonstrates a strong understanding of the client's vision and goals. Their agile approach, high level of competence, and personable approach stand out.
Read More
Their communication and ability to capture exactly what I was asking for were impressive.November 14, 2024
Citrusbug Technolabs built an automated system for a veteran medical company. The system needed to collect and store user data, generate customized letters based on surveys, and use AI to summarize reviews.
Citrusbug Technolabs delivered a functional automated system that successfully organized the client's records and auto-generated statements. The team was quick to respond, addressed all roadblocks, and communicated effectively. Overall, their ability to understand the client's needs stood out.
Read More
They were very calm and talented, and they did bring some of their own ideas.January 28, 2025
Citrusbug Technolabs has developed an MVP for a freight and capacity marketplace. The team has created three different interfaces for three market segments.
Citrusbug Technolabs has successfully developed an effective MVP. The team has delivered the project on time and almost within budget. Moreover, their responses have been timely. Overall, the team has been calm, talented, and innovative. This has led to the client's satisfaction.
Read More
What stood out most about them was their personalized approach and sense of ownership in every aspect of the project."February 27, 2024
Citrusbug Technolabs built a Flutter cross-platform mobile app for an education company. They also developed two web apps and an admin panel and provided DevOps support for the client's infrastructure.
Citrusbug Technolabs' support successfully boosted the client's user engagement by 8x, resulting in an 85% retention rate. The reliable team demonstrated a dedication to delivering on time and promptly responding to concerns and adjustments. Their personalized, client-centric approach stood out.
Read More
They didn't like the phrase "impossible to do", which made them very solution-oriented.February 19, 2024
A healthcare company hired Citrusbug Technolabs to design and develop a user-friendly application. The team provided tailored assistance to meet the client's requirements.
Citrusbug Technolabs successfully delivered an application that was ready for market. The team was highly professional and well-organized; they stayed focused throughout the engagement and were receptive to changes. Overall, they stood out for their trustworthiness and commitment to excellence.
Read More
They're 100% on time and transparent throughout each stage of the project.February 24, 2024
A financial technology company has hired Citrusbug Technolabs to build a custom web application. The team handles the development and design of the app.
The project is ongoing, but the client has been satisfied with Citrusbug Technolabs' services. The team is very professional — they always respect timelines and provide regular updates to ensure everyone's on the same page. Also, their transparent approach makes them a trustworthy partner.
Read More
"I do believe they are exceptional at where they stand."
Citrusbug Technolabs took on a mobile app development project for a Singapore-based development house. They were provided with UX designs to execute. Currently, they're finalizing and fine-tuning the product.
Citrusbug Technolabs contributed to the successful launch of the product, which has garnered over 10,000 users in just three months. The product has also received support from investors. They consistently followed-up with their progress and delivered at a speedy rate. The team is truly stellar.
Read More
We assess every workload against the 6 Rs before recommending a plan, and we'll tell you plainly when the right answer for a given system is "not yet" or "not at all."
The workload moves as-is, with minimal code changes, onto cloud infrastructure. Fastest path, lowest short-term cost, best for systems under time pressure or with a hard on-premises exit deadline.
Small, targeted changes let the workload take advantage of managed cloud services, like swapping a self-managed database for a managed one, without a full rebuild.
The application is restructured to run cloud-native, usually to fix a real bottleneck rather than for its own sake. This is often the right approach when cloud modernization is needed alongside migration.
The workload is redesigned around cloud-native patterns, microservices, and managed data services, for systems where the current architecture is the actual constraint on growth.
The workload is replaced with a SaaS or managed equivalent instead of migrated, when the custom system was never a differentiator worth maintaining.
The workload is decommissioned instead of moved, because a migration assessment sometimes finds a system nobody needs anymore. We’ll say so.
We inventory applications, infrastructure, and data, then map every dependency between them. This surfaces the risks a spreadsheet audit misses, the third-party integration nobody documented, the batch job that only runs on the third of the month, the service two teams both think they own.
Based on your compliance requirements, existing vendor relationships, and workload profile, we recommend AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud, or a specific split across more than one, and design the account structure and network layout before any workload touches it.
Every workload gets assigned a 6 Rs classification with a documented rationale. Nothing moves as "just lift and shift" by default. If rehosting genuinely is the right call for a given system, we say so and move on rather than padding the plan.
We build the target architecture, IAM policies, and network controls before migration begins, not as a retrofit afterward. This includes the audit trail and access logging that current data residency expectations require as a deliverable, not an afterthought.
Workloads move on a defined downtime window with a tested rollback plan. Functional testing, performance validation, and data integrity checks run before we call any workload done, not after a client reports something broke.
In the first 30 to 90 days after cutover, we tune resource allocation, validate cost against the original TCO estimate, and hand over runbooks your team can actually operate from, before we step back.
Moving a regulated workload changes where your compliance obligations actually live, and getting that wrong shows up in an audit, not a demo. We design migrations around the standards your workloads are actually held to, current DORA requirements for EU financial and ICT third-party operations, the EU Data Act's restrictions on foreign-government data access, HIPAA for healthcare data, and SOC 2 for the access controls auditors expect to see documented.
A migration plan is only as good as the landing zone it lands in. Before any workload moves, we design the multi-account structure, identity model, and network boundaries that will host it, so the architecture isn't something your team has to fix six months after go-live.
We scope and price the assessment separately from execution. That means the recommendation isn't shaped by needing to sell you a bigger migration than your workloads actually justify.
Some workloads in an assessment come back with a recommendation to decommission or replace, not migrate. We put that in writing even when it means a smaller engagement.
Cloud spend gets designed in at the landing zone stage, autoscaling policies, storage tiering, reserved capacity, not left as a FinOps cleanup project for six months post-launch.
The cost of cloud migration consulting services depends on workload count, data volume, infrastructure complexity, and compliance scope. Most enterprise migration engagements land between $40,000 and $200,000+, depending on how much of the 6 Rs work involves refactoring versus a straightforward rehost.
Workload audit, dependency mapping, and 6 Rs classification with a documented migration roadmap and TCO estimate.
Everything in the assessment, plus full execution: landing zone build, migration, and validated cutover.
Assessment and execution, plus 90 days of post-migration tuning and a transition into ongoing cloud support.
A successful migration should leave your team with a clear understanding of what was moved, why it was moved, how it is supported, and what comes next. Every engagement includes the documentation, architecture decisions, and operational runbooks your team needs to manage the environment after migration.
Workload Assessment Report covering dependencies, risks, and recommended migration paths
Migration Roadmap and TCO Analysis with sequencing, timelines, and projected cloud costs
Landing Zone Documentation covering accounts, networking, identity, security, and governance
Cutover and Rollback Runbooks for controlled production transitions and recovery
Post-Migration Support to resolve issues and stabilize workloads after go-live
Cloud spend is designed into the architecture during the landing zone build, not addressed after your first surprising bill. Autoscaling, storage tiering, and reserved capacity get planned before go-live.
.svg){kind=icon}
Post-migration issues don’t wait for business hours, and neither do we. Optional L1/L2/L3 SLA coverage picks up where the 30-day handoff window ends.
You get a running view of what moved, what’s queued, and what’s blocked, updated daily during active migration windows, not buried in a periodic status report.
.svg){kind=icon}
We tell you when a workload shouldn’t move yet, or at all, even when that means a smaller engagement than the one we quoted at the start.
Migration decisions get made by engineers who’ve run cutovers before, not assigned to whoever’s available that sprint.
Our Secure ADLC methodology embeds security review into every migration phase, not as a pre-launch audit that finds problems too late to fix cheaply.
Custom Software Development
Introduction SaaS application development services and cloud services are two of the most popular modern-day technologies. Often used for one another, both terms are different but have many things in…
Read Article →
Custom Software Development
Introduction Healthcare is deep into a cloud-first decade, where digital transformation, data-driven decision-making, and scalable cloud platforms are reshaping how care is delivered and managed. Electronic health records, imaging, telehealth,…
Read Article →
Custom Software Development
The real estate brokerage software market has shifted from a niche technology category to a core part of how property transactions are managed globally. Brokerages of all sizes now rely…
Read Article →Most enterprise engagements range from $40,000 to $250,000+, depending on workload count, data volume, and how much refactoring versus straight rehosting is involved.
Assessment usually runs 3 to 6 weeks. Full migration timelines range from 8 weeks for a focused rehost to 6+ months for multi-workload rearchitecture.
All three, plus hybrid and multi-cloud setups. Platform choice comes out of the assessment, not a predetermined preference.
We say so in the assessment report. Retire and repurchase are valid recommendations, and we'd rather scope a smaller engagement than migrate something that shouldn't move.
Every workload gets a tested rollback plan before cutover begins, executed by the same team that built the migration, not handed off cold.
Yes. Compliance requirements are built into the landing zone architecture and access controls before migration, not layered on after.
You can start with an assessment alone. Many clients use the roadmap and TCO estimate internally before deciding whether to proceed to execution.
A 30-day active support window covering optimization and validation, with optional ongoing L1/L2/L3 SLA coverage after that.
We work alongside your team by default. Handover documentation and runbooks are built assuming your engineers will operate the environment.
Based on the dependency mapping, business criticality, and growth trajectory uncovered during assessment, each workload gets an individual 6 Rs recommendation with the reasoning documented.
